I like to think a lot, to hear a lot. This means reading, listening, digesting..
I have read in a book from Fritjof Capra, Hidden Connections, that life is based in a dissipative structure. It has a limit between itself and the mean, that limits its structure and things enter and go out from this structure. Life is like that. And everything that has life.

The conscience and the mind has life too. When its stimulated, the mind reacts to the stimulus. A stone reacts when it is kicked, but its reaction is deterministic. The reaction may be deterministic at certain point of view, but it is much more complex and the calculus is much bigger.

I am able only to intuitively and abstractly think about the human subjectivity and the possiblity to see the other person as a subject and not as a object and dont look only to the money, but to the wellfare, and to do conscience and not cience, if I do love.

Love menas that someone, the original subject, resolved historically to make an option to the life.

So there is the subjective side.

This is the historic relation about the life and the act of creating it.

Love mantains, create and brighten the life.

Love and life.

We can imagine and suppose that we live in a Matrix. In a greate computer. Bu life goes beyond the mechanis and the process. It goes beyond software and hardware. Beyonds the matter and the political, social and economical conventions. One piece of the loving subject (loving means, loving life, because its the main character of love, this is the reason fo the intentions logo, "love and life") lays inside the process and the mechanism, and goes beyond this great emptiness to "touch" another potencially loving subject, may be inferior, when treating a plante, superior, to attend the necesstity to teach lovinf values of an abstraction of God, or at the same level, talking to someone that needs help.

In any level, superio, inferior, equal, or at any intermediary dimension, may be consicetnly by attitude, or inconsciently by viggilancy, if there is any use of power, may be the minimum, in that place there is no love.

This is why the well may be bad, to transform may be perveting, if it is without love, if we dont see the subject, but only the object.

(translation from Brazilian Portuguese by me. Sorry, I know did not caught the best english words for this translation)